12 Differences Between RHEL vs Ubuntu: Which One's Better?

12 Differences Between RHEL vs Ubuntu: Which One's Better?

12 Differences Between RHEL vs Ubuntu: Which One's Better? - The choice of an operating system for a server or desktop can be difficult, especially using a large number of options available in the Linux world. The most popular distribution is Red Hat Enterprise Linux RHEL Vs Ubuntu.

Each has its own functions, advantages and target audiences. In this article, it helps to make an important change in RHEL Vs Ubuntu and decide based on the information that meets your needs.

12 Differences Between RHEL vs Ubuntu

Below are some important differences between Rhel and Ubuntu you need to know.

1. License Form

The license is largely separated from the RHEL vs Ubuntu. RHEL works as a commercial distribution and requires a subscription to reach updates and support. On the contrary, Ubuntu is an open source model that allows free access to new programs and updates.

Identification between budget restrictions and necessary support levels. RHEL is compatible with excellent support and stability, but Ubuntu calls accessories and updates that can access most of the wider users.

2. Target Audience

RHEL is mainly for institutional users and provides powerful support, stability and safety that meets specific needs of large-scale institutions. Until then, Ubuntu's goals are users and SMEs.

3. Starting Cycle

RHEL vs Ubuntu was very acceptable. RHEL supports strict launch schedules and LT (long-term support) up to 10 years. This life guarantees stability and reliability in the facility environment.

Ubuntu always provides a new version once per six months. Regardless of the short support period of the non-LT version, they use this strategy to allow users to reach the latest features and updates, 

4. Package Management

Rhel and Ubuntu depend on each package management system using tools. On the contrary, Ubuntu depends on the right, front, and effective tools. Package efficiency can have a major impact on options based on familiarity and taste. 

5. Support and Documentation

Support options and documents vary depending on Ubuntu and RHEL. RHEL offers comprehensive support options such as technical support, training, and certificates. Those support options enable companies with important applications that require reliable support. 

On the contrary, Ubuntu may not be abandoned without a paid subscription although it provides community support through the forum. 

6. Security Work

Red Hat Enterprise and Ubuntu are still high in priority, but the application approach is different.

RHEL emphasizes institutional security functions, such as Selinux (ads) and system safety services (SIS), and provides strong protection against various security threats. On the contrary, Ubuntu provides safety, yet it limits the virtual security settings. 

7. Virtual Desktop Environment

Ubuntu is famous for its desktop environments. It's mainly presented by Genoom as a virtual option. However, to respond to different user preferences, it offers a variety of flavors such as kubuntu (KDE), Xubuntu (Xfce) and Lubuntu (LxQT).

In contrast, the RHEL, which is mainly directed, does not include the default desktop environment. However, users can create different options such as GNome and KDE, or select a lower setting of the connection line (CLI).

8. Society and the Ecosystem

Ubuntu is proud of a vital society consisting of users and developers, which contributes to a wide range of software and support resources.

This approach led by society enhances innovation and rapid development, and makes Ubuntu a positive choice among desktop users and developers.

On the contrary, RHEL also has a Linux support community, but it may not provide a third program and a society that society holds with the same Ubuntu offer.

9. System versus Upstart

Another difference between RHEL vs Ubuntu is its initial point.  Ubuntu started for the first time since Ubuntu 15.04 and has moved to Systemd, however The RHEL system has been used as a default system since Rhel 7.

Furthermore, the latest Linux distribution Start-Up standard system that provides tasks such as parallel startups, powerful service management, and convergence sequence has appeared.

10. Support the Container 

RHEL vs Ubuntu is like Docker and Kubernetes. RHEL provides additional container management tools and features via the optimal OpenSHIFT platform to coordinate and manage the container. 

Ubuntu can also implement a container evenly, but it can give priority to the small publishing and development environment due to the ease of its use and the ecosystem of the community led by society.

11. Devices Compatibility

RHEL system and Ubuntu have a variety of ways to comply with the device. RHEL emphasizes stability and long support in an institutional environment that protects a wide range of devices. 

Ubuntu, on the other hand, can provide more frequent updates and new devices for users who want to support the latest devices, desktop devices and development scenarios.

12. Integration and Support of the Cloud

RHEL and Ubuntu support the cloud computing environment, but you can change the approach.

RHEL offers main cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud and smooth mixtures, providing custom tools and services according to the Cloud Program and Management program. 

In addition, Rhel benefits from partnerships with the main cloud service providers to ensure optimal performance and support the burden of the institution's work.

On the other hand, Ubuntu is compatible with the cloud environment, but it may attract users who are looking for a more flexible and societal approach than the cloud integration. 

With a wide range of documents and support in the active community, it is common to spread and manage application-based applications, especially among developers and SMEs.

In conclusion, the last selection of RHEL vs Ubuntu depends on the requirements, preferences, and specified budget. 

RHEL is a perfect option for its powerful support, enormous safety function, and fixed stability. On the contrary, Ubuntu will appear as a better competitor for small institutions that try to use simple solutions easily. 

Each Linux distribution contains a set of advantages and defects, and it is necessary to consider carefully based on individual priority. Both Linux platforms are justified because they meet the various needs in the technology ecosystem. 

Whether reliability, simplicity, and diversity are prioritized, the perception of RHEL vs Ubuntu contributions confirms the indispensable role in forming a modern scene of the operating system.